logo
close iconGo back

What If We Rebuilt Trust in the Job Market?

How Transparency Can Save Billions -

blog cover image

At The Job Applicant Perspective, we’re reimagining how hiring works by introducing one simple, powerful ingredient: trust.

It might sound idealistic. But if we’re right—that building accountability into the job market actually works—then the impact could be far greater than just better job seeker experiences. We might be looking at billions of dollars in saved time, productivity, and opportunity.

Let’s break it down.


🔍 The Problem: A Hiring Market That Rewards Engagement—Not Solutions

The current online job market is a system that profits from volume. Not accuracy. Not outcomes. Not trust.

It rewards:

  • More applications

  • More job post clicks

  • More “engagement”

What it doesn’t reward is:

  • Better matches

  • Honest experiences

  • Efficiency for either side

Without accountability to job seekers, there’s no real pressure to improve the experience. Employers post ghost jobs. Recruiters duplicate listings. Job boards measure success in clicks, not results.

It’s no wonder we have:

  • 27+ million long-term unemployed or underemployed people

  • Employers frustrated by “talent shortages” and high turnover

  • Job seekers burning out, disillusioned, and giving up


💡 Our Hypothesis: Trust Is a Market Force

We believe that transparent, crowdsourced feedback on job postings can do for hiring what reviews did for Uber, Airbnb, and Yelp.

If job seekers could leave honest, anonymous reviews of the hiring experience… If employers could be recognized for a respectful, fair process (or held accountable when it falls short)... If small businesses could stand out by how they hire—not just what they offer...

…we’d start seeing a shift in behavior. A shift toward quality. Toward alignment. Toward mutual trust.


💰 The Economic Impact: What If We’re Right?

Let’s be conservative.

  • The global talent acquisition industry is worth $159 billion (and growing)

  • The average cost-per-hire is ~$4,700

  • The cost of a bad hire can be over $15,000

  • Time-to-fill averages 44 days

Now imagine that a trusted review system cut inefficiencies by just 10%:

That’s $15.9 billion/year saved across hiring systems globally.

Not to mention:

  • Faster time-to-hire

  • Lower employee turnover

  • More qualified applicants

  • Less wasted effort for job seekers

  • Better retention and morale inside teams

And there’s a multiplier effect: trust gets employers better hires, and job seekers more confidence in where they’re applying. That leads to stronger companies, stronger communities, and more resilient economies.


🔁 The Flywheel of Trust

Trust isn’t just about warm feelings. It’s about data, accountability, and signal quality in a noisy market. Here’s how it works:

  1. Job seekers leave reviews

  2. Employers learn what’s working (and what’s not)

  3. Great hiring gets recognized

  4. Job seekers apply where they’re more likely to succeed

  5. Job boards become solutions, not just listings

  6. The entire hiring market becomes more efficient


🚀 We’re Building That Future

We don’t just believe in this idea—we built the platform.
At The Job Applicant Perspective, we’ve launched the first job board + job post review system designed for both sides of the hiring market.

It’s small now. But it’s growing—review by review.
And with every insight shared, the signal gets clearer, the trust gets stronger, and the system gets smarter.


💬 Final Thought

The question isn’t “What if we built a reputation system for hiring?”
The real question is:

What happens if we don’t?

Because continuing with ghost jobs, wasted time, and no accountability is already costing us billions.

It’s time to build a better system—together.

👉 www.thejobapplicantperspective.com